The 60-second version of Andhra Cements Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly improving on the years of data available.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | — | ₹266 Cr | ₹273 Cr | ₹441 Cr | — |
| EBITDA | -₹23 Cr | -₹14 Cr | -₹30 Cr | ₹15 Cr | — |
| EBITDA Margin | — | -5.2% | -11.1% | 3.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹950 Cr | -₹66 Cr | -₹152 Cr | -₹67 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹696.4 | ₹-7.12 | ₹-16.5 | ₹-7.29 | — |
| ROE | 267.3% | -22.1% | -105.2% | -83.2% | — |
| ROCE | 101.9% | -5.1% | -12.1% | -5.7% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹525 Cr | ₹675 Cr | ₹769 Cr | ₹1,166 Cr | +30.5% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹28 Cr | -₹141 Cr | -₹25 Cr | -₹251 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED | 37.6x | 11.1% |
| GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD | 34.8x | 5.5% |
| AMBUJA CEMENTS LTD | 20.4x | 7.4% |
| SHREE CEMENT LIMITED | 49.7x | 7.0% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 6 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.