The 60-second version of Amin Tannery Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹51 Cr | ₹45 Cr | ₹40 Cr | ₹33 Cr | -13.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹3 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹3 Cr | -5.5% |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.2% | 6.3% | 6.5% | 8.0% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | -14.9% |
| EPS | ₹0.03 | ₹0.03 | ₹0.03 | ₹0.02 | -12.6% |
| ROE | 3.0% | 2.9% | 2.3% | 1.7% | — |
| ROCE | 14.2% | 14.2% | 12.0% | 13.5% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹29 Cr | ₹29 Cr | ₹29 Cr | ₹29 Cr | +0.2% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹3 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -19.4% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.