The 60-second version of Antarctica Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | 2Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -9.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | — |
| EBITDA Margin | 12.5% | 3.6% | -40.5% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹0 | ₹-0 | — | — |
| ROE | 0.1% | -0.0% | -2.6% | — |
| ROCE | 0.1% | -0.0% | -2.2% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹3 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹3 Cr | -1.2% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 4 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.