The 60-second version of ARCL Organics Ltd. — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹164 Cr | ₹189 Cr | ₹248 Cr | ₹270 Cr | +18.0% |
| EBITDA | ₹21 Cr | ₹21 Cr | ₹25 Cr | ₹28 Cr | +10.1% |
| EBITDA Margin | 12.8% | 11.2% | 10.2% | 10.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹12 Cr | ₹11 Cr | ₹12 Cr | ₹5 Cr | -23.7% |
| EPS | ₹14.59 | ₹14.12 | ₹15.42 | ₹6.49 | -23.7% |
| ROE | 21.5% | 17.3% | 15.9% | 6.3% | — |
| ROCE | 26.1% | 19.0% | 19.8% | 17.7% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹20 Cr | ₹29 Cr | ₹34 Cr | ₹71 Cr | +51.7% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹3 Cr | -₹8 Cr | -₹5 Cr | -₹39 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
| PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LTD | 57.8x | 24.4% |
| SRF LTD | 33.8x | 15.4% |
| UPL LIMITED | 21.5x | 6.1% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.