The 60-second version of Rajdarshan Industries Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
What does this company do?
Rajdarshan Industries Limited trades in quartz grit and powder, and consumables n commission basis in India. It is also involved in the project management, marketing consultancy, limestone, cement plant, marble and mines machine activities, as well as trading in minerals.
IndustryOther Industrial Metals & Mining
SectorBasic Materials
Employees3
Annual revenue₹1 Cr
How does it make money?
Turns over ₹1 Cr a year. Of every ₹100 of sales, about ₹-31 reaches shareholders as profit, with ₹18 left at the operating level before interest, tax and depreciation. Each of its 3 employees supports ₹19.1 lakh of revenue a year, the signature of a people-led business.
Revenue / employee₹19.1 lakh
Who are its competitors?
The closest listed comparisons in its industry are HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD, VEDANTA LIMITED, TATA STEEL LIMITED. These are the companies its valuation and returns are measured against elsewhere in this report.
What is its competitive advantage?Little sign of one
Returns on capital of 0.2% are at or below what the capital likely costs. That is the financial pattern of a business competing largely on price, where advantage has to come from execution rather than position.
Peer median ROE12.0%
What has been driving growth?
Profit has moved mainly because margins changed, not because the business sold much more. Over 3 years revenue moved -70% while net margin moved -298% relative to itself. What this cannot tell you is which products, customers or geographies did the work — that lives in the segment disclosures of the annual report.
Revenue effect-70%
Margin effect-298%
DalalBaazaar Score
33/ 100
Weak
Weighted across six categories. Every point is explained below.
✗ Return on equity is negative
Quality vs. Valuation
Company Quality
30/ 100
Weak
How good the business is, ignoring the share price entirely.
vs
Valuation
30/ 100
Expensive
What you are being asked to pay, ignoring how good the business is.
Weak on business quality and not cheap enough to compensate.
vs. its own history
Not enough price and earnings history
vs. sector peers
Not enough peers with a usable P/E
vs. generic bands
N/A
No P/E — the company is lossmaking
EV/EBITDA
104.5x
PEG
—
Red Flags
3 items require attention · 3 high
🔴Free cash flow negative for 4 yearsFinancial
The business has not covered its capital spending from operations for several years running, which has to be funded externally.
🔴The company is lossmakingFinancial
Net profit of -₹0 Cr in the latest reported year.
🔴Receivables growing faster than salesFinancial
Receivables up 114% against revenue up -70% — sales are being booked faster than they are collected.
Investment Thesis
🟢 Bull CaseWhat could make this work?
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
🔴 Bear CaseWhat could go wrong?
Sales are being booked faster than collected
Receivables are up 114% against revenue up -70%. If customers keep taking longer to pay, reported profit will not turn into cash — and write-offs follow if some never do.
Earnings are hard to forecast
Profit has swung sharply from year to year, so any single year — good or bad — is a weak guide to the next. Cyclical earnings deserve lower multiples for that reason.
Size brings its own risk
Micro Cap businesses are thinly traded, so exits are harder in a falling market and single events move the price more than they would for a larger company.
Several serious flags at once
3 high-severity checks triggered. Individually each has an explanation; together they raise the chance that something structural is wrong rather than a one-off.
🟡 Key Things to WatchMeasurable tripwires, set against where this company stands today
1EBITDA margin holds above 16%✓ 17.6%
Two points below today's level — enough room for noise, tight enough to catch real compression.
2Free cash flow remains positive✗ -₹0 Cr
Profit that never becomes cash eventually stops being profit.
3ROCE stays above 8%✗ 0.2%
Falling returns on capital are usually competition arriving, and show up here before they reach the margin.
Investment Checklist
4 / 10 checks passed
✗ Strong return on equity (ROE ≥ 15%)
✗ Strong return on capital employed (ROCE ≥ 15%)
✗ Healthy net margin (≥ 10%)
✗ Generates positive free cash flow
✓ Adequate short-term liquidity (Current Ratio ≥ 1.0)
✗ Revenue growing year-over-year
✓ Profit growing year-over-year
✓ Not trading at an extreme valuation (P/E < 40x)
✓ Not buying right at the 52-week high
✗ Short-term technical trend isn't bearish
Price history
Quick Metrics
2 good · 3 neutral · 6 weak
Market Cap
₹11 Cr
Micro Cap
Smaller company — thin liquidity and deep drawdowns are normal here
P/E (Trailing)
Not meaningful
Loss-making
Earnings are negative, so a P/E multiple can't be read here
P/B Ratio
0.50x
Reasonable
Reasonable against the company's book value
EPS (TTM)
₹-0.21
Loss-making
Negative earnings per share — the business is losing money
ROE
-0.9%
Weak
Weak capital efficiency
ROCE
0.2%
Weak
Low return on total capital employed
Debt/Equity
Not available
No data
Source didn't return this field
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-1.6%
Shrinking
Sales are contracting
Profit Growth (YoY)
46.2%
Healthy
Profits growing at a healthy clip
Dividend Yield
None
None
No dividend yield reported — usually means no payout, but verify if one was recently initiated
Free Cash Flow
-₹0 Cr
Cash burning
Spending more cash than the operations bring in
More Metrics
Operating Margin
-35.4%
Weak
Thin margins leave little room for error
Net Margin
-11.2%
Weak
Very little revenue reaches the bottom line
Current Ratio
38.07
Comfortable
Healthy short-term liquidity
Beta (vs Nifty)
0.02
Defensive
Steadier than the market
52W Range Position
16%
Mid-range
Mid-range
Technical Snapshot
SMA 20 / SMA 50
33.6 / 35.2
Bearish alignment (short < long)
Price vs SMA 200
Below
Long-term downtrend
RSI (14)
38.5
Neutral momentum
Financial Trend (4-Year)
Metric
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
3Y CAGR
Revenue
₹2 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹1 Cr
-32.9%
EBITDA
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
-31.8%
EBITDA Margin
16.8%
19.6%
2.2%
17.6%
—
PAT (Net Profit)
₹0 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹0 Cr
-₹0 Cr
—
EPS
₹0.95
₹2.32
₹0.76
₹-0.57
—
ROE
1.4%
3.4%
1.1%
-0.9%
—
ROCE
1.5%
4.2%
0.8%
0.2%
—
Free Cash Flow
-₹0 Cr
-₹0 Cr
-₹1 Cr
-₹0 Cr
—
🔴 Revenue has shrunk at 32.9% a year over 3 years.
🔴 EBITDA has shrunk at 31.8% a year over 3 years.
🟡 EBITDA Margin has held roughly flat at 17.6% over 3 years.
🔴 PAT (Net Profit) has turned negative, from ₹0 Cr to -₹0 Cr.
🔴 EPS has turned negative, from ₹0.95 to ₹-0.57.
🔴 ROE has fallen from 1.4% to -0.9% over 3 years (-2.3 pts).
🔴 ROCE has fallen from 1.5% to 0.2% over 3 years (-1.3 pts).
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.
2 of 3 tripwires tripped — Free cash flow remains positive; ROCE stays above 8% · see Key things to watch ↑