The 60-second version of Artson Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹131 Cr | ₹128 Cr | ₹114 Cr | ₹157 Cr | +6.2% |
| EBITDA | -₹13 Cr | ₹12 Cr | -₹3 Cr | -₹8 Cr | — |
| EBITDA Margin | -9.9% | 9.3% | -2.8% | -4.9% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | -₹24 Cr | ₹6 Cr | ₹3 Cr | -₹11 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹-6.37 | ₹1.64 | ₹0.94 | ₹-2.95 | — |
| ROE | — | 661.3% | 74.4% | -2795.0% | — |
| ROCE | -197.7% | 45.6% | 47.6% | -47.9% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹59 Cr | ₹64 Cr | ₹49 Cr | ₹54 Cr | -3.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹7 Cr | -₹7 Cr | ₹18 Cr | -₹8 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| ADANI PORT & SEZ LTD | 29.9x | 14.1% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.