The 60-second version of Best Agrolife Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹1,746 Cr | ₹1,873 Cr | ₹1,809 Cr | ₹1,248 Cr | -10.6% |
| EBITDA | ₹312 Cr | ₹225 Cr | ₹199 Cr | ₹100 Cr | -31.6% |
| EBITDA Margin | 17.8% | 12.0% | 11.0% | 8.0% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹192 Cr | ₹106 Cr | ₹70 Cr | ₹9 Cr | -64.1% |
| EPS | ₹5.42 | ₹3 | ₹1.97 | ₹0.25 | -64.1% |
| ROE | 36.4% | 16.4% | 9.2% | 1.2% | — |
| ROCE | 49.3% | 27.2% | 19.3% | 7.0% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹568 Cr | ₹637 Cr | ₹478 Cr | ₹442 Cr | -8.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹218 Cr | -₹10 Cr | ₹207 Cr | ₹90 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | 19.8x | 10.8% |
| JSW STEEL LIMITED | 12.0x | 24.7% |
| ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED | 37.6x | 11.1% |
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.