The 60-second version of Bilcare Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹965 Cr | ₹738 Cr | ₹776 Cr | ₹723 Cr | -9.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹65 Cr | ₹56 Cr | ₹64 Cr | ₹77 Cr | +6.0% |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.7% | 7.6% | 8.3% | 10.7% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹15 Cr | -₹33 Cr | -₹1 Cr | ₹2 Cr | -51.4% |
| EPS | ₹6.39 | ₹-14.12 | ₹-0.32 | ₹0.73 | -51.5% |
| ROE | 2.8% | -15.8% | -0.4% | 0.9% | — |
| ROCE | 20.2% | 1.3% | 6.5% | 8.7% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹639 Cr | ₹756 Cr | ₹689 Cr | ₹620 Cr | -1.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹7 Cr | -₹57 Cr | ₹64 Cr | ₹117 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.