The 60-second version of Bondada Engineering Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹370 Cr | ₹800 Cr | ₹1,569 Cr | ₹2,839 Cr | +97.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹30 Cr | ₹70 Cr | ₹181 Cr | ₹336 Cr | +124.4% |
| EBITDA Margin | 8.0% | 8.7% | 11.5% | 11.8% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹17 Cr | ₹45 Cr | ₹110 Cr | ₹203 Cr | +129.9% |
| EPS | ₹1.55 | ₹4.63 | ₹10.06 | ₹18.25 | +127.5% |
| ROE | 21.4% | 27.8% | 24.6% | 29.3% | — |
| ROCE | 31.8% | 36.4% | 34.5% | 42.5% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹84 Cr | ₹80 Cr | ₹192 Cr | ₹292 Cr | +51.4% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹36 Cr | ₹26 Cr | -₹184 Cr | ₹84 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| ADANI PORT & SEZ LTD | 29.9x | 14.1% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
A good business currently available at an undemanding price — the combination this framework exists to look for. The work left is qualitative: whether the advantage the numbers imply is one you can identify and expect to last. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.