The 60-second version of Brisk Technovision Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹18 Cr | ₹27 Cr | ₹30 Cr | ₹30 Cr | +17.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹3 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹2 Cr | -8.8% |
| EBITDA Margin | 13.8% | 10.2% | 5.0% | 6.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹2 Cr | ₹2 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -18.1% |
| EPS | ₹9.24 | ₹10.02 | ₹4.84 | — | — |
| ROE | 38.6% | 29.5% | 13.7% | 13.6% | — |
| ROCE | 51.7% | 39.8% | 18.1% | 18.4% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹0 Cr | — | — | ₹1 Cr | +82.8% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹2 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹2 Cr | -₹1 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TATA CONSULTANCY SERV LT | 17.3x | 45.6% |
| INFOSYS LIMITED | 15.8x | 32.0% |
| HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD | 20.4x | 24.6% |
| WIPRO LTD | 14.5x | 15.9% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 5 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.