The 60-second version of Chembond Material Technologies Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹439 Cr | ₹178 Cr | ₹199 Cr | ₹249 Cr | -17.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹37 Cr | ₹8 Cr | ₹16 Cr | ₹21 Cr | -17.7% |
| EBITDA Margin | 8.5% | 4.4% | 7.9% | 8.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹25 Cr | ₹11 Cr | ₹18 Cr | ₹13 Cr | -19.9% |
| EPS | ₹18.66 | ₹8.31 | ₹13.06 | ₹9.59 | -19.9% |
| ROE | 7.8% | 7.8% | 11.2% | 7.7% | — |
| ROCE | 10.6% | 12.1% | 12.8% | 9.4% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹7 Cr | ₹7 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹4 Cr | -14.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹14 Cr | ₹83 Cr | ₹15 Cr | -₹6 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
| PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LTD | 57.8x | 24.4% |
| SRF LTD | 33.8x | 15.4% |
| UPL LIMITED | 21.5x | 6.1% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.