The 60-second version of Chemcrux Enterprises Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹81 Cr | ₹57 Cr | ₹58 Cr | ₹60 Cr | -9.4% |
| EBITDA | ₹22 Cr | ₹14 Cr | ₹10 Cr | ₹12 Cr | -18.2% |
| EBITDA Margin | 27.2% | 25.1% | 18.1% | 20.0% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹14 Cr | ₹8 Cr | ₹4 Cr | ₹4 Cr | -36.2% |
| EPS | ₹9.7 | ₹5.7 | ₹2.64 | ₹2.52 | -36.2% |
| ROE | 21.6% | 11.7% | 5.2% | 4.9% | — |
| ROCE | 25.6% | 12.5% | 7.0% | 8.1% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹14 Cr | ₹26 Cr | ₹42 Cr | ₹34 Cr | +33.6% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹4 Cr | -₹8 Cr | -₹1 Cr | ₹9 Cr | +33.6% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
| PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LTD | 57.8x | 24.4% |
| SRF LTD | 33.8x | 15.4% |
| UPL LIMITED | 21.5x | 6.1% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.