The 60-second version of Chemplast Sanmar Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly improving on the years of data available.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹4,935 Cr | ₹3,916 Cr | ₹4,328 Cr | ₹4,216 Cr | -5.1% |
| EBITDA | ₹466 Cr | -₹6 Cr | ₹155 Cr | ₹124 Cr | -35.6% |
| EBITDA Margin | 9.4% | -0.1% | 3.6% | 3.0% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹152 Cr | -₹158 Cr | -₹110 Cr | -₹280 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹9.64 | ₹-10.02 | ₹-6.92 | ₹-17.7 | — |
| ROE | 8.2% | -9.3% | -5.3% | -16.0% | — |
| ROCE | 6.8% | -3.9% | -1.1% | -7.1% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹1,019 Cr | ₹1,548 Cr | ₹1,842 Cr | ₹1,952 Cr | +24.2% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹64 Cr | -₹864 Cr | -₹211 Cr | -₹22 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LTD | 57.8x | 24.4% |
| SRF LTD | 33.8x | 15.4% |
| UPL LIMITED | 21.5x | 6.1% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 5 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.