The 60-second version of Cosmo First Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹3,025 Cr | ₹2,536 Cr | ₹2,809 Cr | ₹3,522 Cr | +5.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹404 Cr | ₹216 Cr | ₹341 Cr | ₹452 Cr | +3.8% |
| EBITDA Margin | 13.4% | 8.5% | 12.1% | 12.8% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹244 Cr | ₹62 Cr | ₹133 Cr | ₹156 Cr | -13.9% |
| EPS | ₹89.45 | ₹23.64 | ₹50.79 | ₹59.68 | -12.6% |
| ROE | 18.8% | 4.6% | 9.1% | 9.6% | — |
| ROCE | 16.2% | 6.6% | 8.9% | 10.5% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹932 Cr | ₹1,048 Cr | ₹1,438 Cr | ₹1,680 Cr | +21.7% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹85 Cr | -₹52 Cr | -₹336 Cr | -₹15 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.