The 60-second version of DCW Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹2,627 Cr | ₹1,861 Cr | ₹2,000 Cr | ₹2,144 Cr | -6.5% |
| EBITDA | ₹437 Cr | ₹185 Cr | ₹216 Cr | ₹241 Cr | -18.0% |
| EBITDA Margin | 16.6% | 9.9% | 10.8% | 11.2% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹192 Cr | ₹16 Cr | ₹30 Cr | ₹48 Cr | -36.9% |
| EPS | ₹6.5 | ₹0.53 | ₹1.02 | ₹1.63 | -36.9% |
| ROE | 18.7% | 1.5% | 2.9% | 4.5% | — |
| ROCE | 25.2% | 6.1% | 8.1% | 9.9% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹508 Cr | ₹439 Cr | ₹427 Cr | ₹290 Cr | -17.1% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹140 Cr | ₹158 Cr | ₹146 Cr | ₹278 Cr | +25.8% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LTD | 57.8x | 24.4% |
| SRF LTD | 33.8x | 15.4% |
| UPL LIMITED | 21.5x | 6.1% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.