The 60-second version of EMS Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹538 Cr | ₹793 Cr | ₹972 Cr | ₹733 Cr | +10.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹151 Cr | ₹208 Cr | ₹261 Cr | ₹142 Cr | -2.0% |
| EBITDA Margin | 28.1% | 26.2% | 26.9% | 19.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹108 Cr | ₹152 Cr | ₹184 Cr | ₹91 Cr | -5.6% |
| EPS | ₹19.39 | ₹29.38 | ₹33.05 | ₹16.3 | -5.6% |
| ROE | 21.9% | 19.1% | 18.8% | 8.6% | — |
| ROCE | 26.5% | 23.6% | 23.6% | 11.3% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹45 Cr | ₹71 Cr | ₹86 Cr | ₹154 Cr | +50.3% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹5 Cr | -₹149 Cr | ₹30 Cr | -₹88 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| ADANI PORT & SEZ LTD | 29.9x | 14.1% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 4 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.