The 60-second version of Eureka Forbes Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹2,080 Cr | ₹2,184 Cr | ₹2,422 Cr | ₹2,693 Cr | +9.0% |
| EBITDA | ₹147 Cr | ₹203 Cr | ₹275 Cr | ₹335 Cr | +31.4% |
| EBITDA Margin | 7.1% | 9.3% | 11.3% | 12.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹26 Cr | ₹96 Cr | ₹164 Cr | ₹163 Cr | +83.1% |
| EPS | ₹1.37 | ₹4.93 | ₹8.46 | ₹8.36 | +82.7% |
| ROE | 0.6% | 2.3% | 3.7% | 3.5% | — |
| ROCE | 1.1% | 2.7% | 4.2% | 4.0% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹140 Cr | ₹39 Cr | ₹26 Cr | ₹29 Cr | -40.9% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹159 Cr | ₹166 Cr | ₹186 Cr | ₹162 Cr | +0.6% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| HAVELLS INDIA LIMITED | 43.5x | 17.1% |
| VOLTAS LTD | 75.8x | 7.0% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.