The 60-second version of Flex Foods Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly improving on the years of data available.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹113 Cr | ₹120 Cr | ₹149 Cr | ₹190 Cr | +18.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹11 Cr | -₹3 Cr | -₹5 Cr | -₹0 Cr | — |
| EBITDA Margin | 9.3% | -2.7% | -3.7% | -0.2% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | -₹11 Cr | -₹26 Cr | -₹32 Cr | -₹32 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹-8.51 | ₹-20.83 | ₹-26.1 | ₹-25.54 | — |
| ROE | -10.4% | -34.5% | -77.7% | -344.8% | — |
| ROCE | 0.2% | -7.1% | -8.9% | -8.1% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹236 Cr | ₹263 Cr | ₹280 Cr | ₹308 Cr | +9.3% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹82 Cr | -₹17 Cr | ₹6 Cr | -₹1 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| NESTLE INDIA LIMITED | 59.8x | 79.9% |
| BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD | 44.1x | 51.0% |
| TATA CONSUMER PRODUCT LTD | 59.3x | 7.5% |
| DABUR INDIA LTD | 34.7x | 17.2% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 5 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.