The 60-second version of Generic Engineering Construction and Projects Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹273 Cr | ₹289 Cr | ₹302 Cr | ₹305 Cr | +3.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹42 Cr | ₹35 Cr | ₹45 Cr | ₹39 Cr | -2.7% |
| EBITDA Margin | 15.6% | 12.1% | 14.8% | 12.8% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹15 Cr | ₹11 Cr | ₹12 Cr | ₹9 Cr | -17.8% |
| EPS | ₹3.54 | ₹1.93 | ₹1.63 | ₹1.5 | -24.9% |
| ROE | 6.1% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 2.9% | — |
| ROCE | 10.0% | 7.5% | 10.9% | 8.4% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹59 Cr | ₹68 Cr | ₹67 Cr | ₹64 Cr | +2.8% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹10 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -₹15 Cr | ₹11 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| ADANI PORT & SEZ LTD | 29.9x | 14.1% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.