The 60-second version of Gillanders Arbuthnot and Company Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly improving on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹444 Cr | ₹358 Cr | ₹440 Cr | ₹428 Cr | -1.3% |
| EBITDA | ₹31 Cr | -₹22 Cr | ₹35 Cr | ₹33 Cr | +1.9% |
| EBITDA Margin | 7.1% | -6.0% | 7.9% | 7.7% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹15 Cr | -₹49 Cr | ₹27 Cr | ₹9 Cr | -13.9% |
| EPS | ₹6.95 | ₹-22.78 | ₹12.52 | ₹4.43 | -13.9% |
| ROE | 5.4% | -22.4% | 10.9% | 3.7% | — |
| ROCE | 8.3% | -12.1% | 11.8% | 6.8% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹133 Cr | ₹117 Cr | ₹127 Cr | ₹137 Cr | +1.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹37 Cr | ₹28 Cr | -₹0 Cr | ₹4 Cr | -53.4% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. | 42.5x | 21.5% |
| ITC LTD | 16.6x | 27.4% |
| NESTLE INDIA LIMITED | 59.8x | 79.9% |
| BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD | 44.1x | 51.0% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.