The 60-second version of GKW Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹20 Cr | ₹39 Cr | ₹33 Cr | ₹32 Cr | +16.4% |
| EBITDA | ₹14 Cr | ₹29 Cr | -₹6 Cr | ₹16 Cr | +4.3% |
| EBITDA Margin | 70.3% | 74.1% | -18.8% | 50.5% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹9 Cr | ₹14 Cr | -₹18 Cr | -₹2 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹14.71 | ₹23.22 | ₹-30.95 | ₹-3.87 | — |
| ROE | 0.4% | 0.6% | -0.7% | -0.1% | — |
| ROCE | 0.5% | 0.6% | -0.3% | 0.4% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | +75.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹5 Cr | ₹8 Cr | -₹215 Cr | ₹17 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
| ABB INDIA LIMITED | 92.6x | 19.1% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 4 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.