The 60-second version of Gloster Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly improving on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹698 Cr | ₹641 Cr | ₹728 Cr | ₹1,418 Cr | +26.6% |
| EBITDA | ₹112 Cr | ₹76 Cr | ₹61 Cr | ₹168 Cr | +14.5% |
| EBITDA Margin | 16.0% | 11.9% | 8.4% | 11.8% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹54 Cr | ₹24 Cr | -₹13 Cr | ₹18 Cr | -30.7% |
| EPS | ₹49.7 | ₹22.25 | ₹-12.2 | ₹16.57 | -30.7% |
| ROE | 5.0% | 2.2% | -1.2% | 1.7% | — |
| ROCE | 6.0% | 3.0% | 1.7% | 6.3% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹73 Cr | ₹194 Cr | ₹579 Cr | ₹959 Cr | +135.7% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹85 Cr | -₹107 Cr | -₹328 Cr | -₹280 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 6 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.