The 60-second version of G.M. Breweries Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹593 Cr | ₹615 Cr | ₹636 Cr | ₹747 Cr | +8.0% |
| EBITDA | ₹132 Cr | ₹125 Cr | ₹137 Cr | ₹202 Cr | +15.2% |
| EBITDA Margin | 22.3% | 20.4% | 21.6% | 27.0% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹100 Cr | ₹152 Cr | ₹129 Cr | ₹157 Cr | +16.2% |
| EPS | ₹43.69 | ₹66.32 | ₹56.48 | ₹68.64 | +16.3% |
| ROE | 14.6% | 18.4% | 13.7% | 14.5% | — |
| ROCE | 19.2% | 22.0% | 17.1% | 19.1% | — |
| Total Debt | — | — | ₹56 Cr | ₹35 Cr | — |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹96 Cr | ₹59 Cr | ₹162 Cr | -₹141 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. | 42.5x | 21.5% |
| ITC LTD | 16.6x | 27.4% |
| NESTLE INDIA LIMITED | 59.8x | 79.9% |
| BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD | 44.1x | 51.0% |
A good business currently available at an undemanding price — the combination this framework exists to look for. The work left is qualitative: whether the advantage the numbers imply is one you can identify and expect to last. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.