The 60-second version of Goodricke Group Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹882 Cr | ₹824 Cr | ₹929 Cr | ₹798 Cr | -3.3% |
| EBITDA | ₹30 Cr | -₹38 Cr | ₹36 Cr | ₹44 Cr | +14.5% |
| EBITDA Margin | 3.4% | -4.6% | 3.9% | 5.6% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | -₹0 Cr | -₹69 Cr | ₹20 Cr | ₹26 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹-0.15 | ₹-32.08 | ₹9.29 | ₹11.83 | — |
| ROE | -0.1% | -28.7% | 7.4% | 8.4% | — |
| ROCE | 1.9% | -15.1% | 6.2% | 6.6% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹68 Cr | ₹126 Cr | ₹77 Cr | ₹19 Cr | -35.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹12 Cr | -₹44 Cr | ₹29 Cr | ₹50 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. | 42.5x | 21.5% |
| ITC LTD | 16.6x | 27.4% |
| NESTLE INDIA LIMITED | 59.8x | 79.9% |
| BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD | 44.1x | 51.0% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.