The 60-second version of GPT Infraprojects Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹803 Cr | ₹1,011 Cr | ₹1,181 Cr | ₹1,282 Cr | +16.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹94 Cr | ₹125 Cr | ₹139 Cr | ₹182 Cr | +24.4% |
| EBITDA Margin | 11.8% | 12.4% | 11.8% | 14.2% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹31 Cr | ₹58 Cr | ₹80 Cr | ₹97 Cr | +45.8% |
| EPS | ₹2.7 | ₹2.49 | ₹6.55 | ₹7.7 | +41.8% |
| ROE | 11.3% | 19.1% | 15.3% | 16.1% | — |
| ROCE | 19.5% | 29.4% | 20.0% | 19.1% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹252 Cr | ₹193 Cr | ₹129 Cr | ₹294 Cr | +5.2% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹60 Cr | ₹97 Cr | -₹32 Cr | ₹10 Cr | -45.9% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| ADANI PORT & SEZ LTD | 29.9x | 14.1% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
A good business currently available at an undemanding price — the combination this framework exists to look for. The work left is qualitative: whether the advantage the numbers imply is one you can identify and expect to last. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.