The 60-second version of Greenlam Industries Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹1,974 Cr | ₹2,247 Cr | ₹2,504 Cr | ₹2,986 Cr | +14.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹246 Cr | ₹315 Cr | ₹280 Cr | ₹329 Cr | +10.2% |
| EBITDA Margin | 12.5% | 14.0% | 11.2% | 11.0% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹129 Cr | ₹138 Cr | ₹70 Cr | ₹56 Cr | -24.1% |
| EPS | ₹5.15 | ₹5.41 | ₹2.68 | ₹2.2 | -24.7% |
| ROE | 13.4% | 12.8% | 6.2% | 4.8% | — |
| ROCE | 13.6% | 12.5% | 8.7% | 9.2% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹628 Cr | ₹1,109 Cr | ₹1,199 Cr | ₹1,160 Cr | +22.7% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹297 Cr | -₹442 Cr | -₹57 Cr | ₹201 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | 19.8x | 10.8% |
| JSW STEEL LIMITED | 12.0x | 24.7% |
| ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED | 37.6x | 11.1% |
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.