The 60-second version of Global Surfaces Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹177 Cr | ₹223 Cr | ₹205 Cr | ₹228 Cr | +8.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹37 Cr | ₹38 Cr | ₹6 Cr | ₹8 Cr | -40.0% |
| EBITDA Margin | 21.0% | 17.1% | 2.8% | 3.5% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹24 Cr | ₹19 Cr | -₹29 Cr | -₹30 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹7.1 | ₹4.41 | ₹-6.73 | ₹-7.18 | — |
| ROE | 9.3% | 5.7% | -9.4% | -11.2% | — |
| ROCE | 8.5% | 6.7% | -3.1% | -2.7% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹167 Cr | ₹146 Cr | ₹201 Cr | ₹216 Cr | +9.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹87 Cr | -₹141 Cr | -₹36 Cr | ₹18 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED | 37.6x | 11.1% |
| GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD | 34.8x | 5.5% |
| AMBUJA CEMENTS LTD | 20.4x | 7.4% |
| SHREE CEMENT LIMITED | 49.7x | 7.0% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 5 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.