The 60-second version of Gujarat Apollo Industries Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹72 Cr | ₹57 Cr | ₹42 Cr | ₹53 Cr | -9.7% |
| EBITDA | ₹19 Cr | ₹21 Cr | ₹12 Cr | ₹15 Cr | -6.7% |
| EBITDA Margin | 26.3% | 37.4% | 28.0% | 29.1% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹12 Cr | ₹11 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹5 Cr | -25.5% |
| EPS | ₹9.68 | ₹9.38 | ₹1.98 | ₹4.8 | -20.8% |
| ROE | 2.6% | 2.3% | 0.3% | 1.0% | — |
| ROCE | 2.8% | 3.2% | 1.9% | 1.9% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹26 Cr | ₹22 Cr | ₹50 Cr | ₹41 Cr | +17.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹76 Cr | -₹1 Cr | -₹37 Cr | -₹50 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
| ABB INDIA LIMITED | 92.6x | 19.1% |
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| HAVELLS INDIA LIMITED | 43.5x | 17.1% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 4 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.