The 60-second version of Gyftr Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹16 Cr | ₹51 Cr | -₹6 Cr | ₹413 Cr | +193.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹21 Cr | ₹80 Cr | ₹7 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -64.4% |
| EBITDA Margin | 130.6% | 158.4% | -121.2% | 0.2% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹14 Cr | ₹59 Cr | ₹2 Cr | ₹22 Cr | +16.3% |
| EPS | ₹2.1 | ₹8.99 | ₹0.25 | ₹3.16 | +14.6% |
| ROE | 4.7% | 16.7% | 0.5% | 4.5% | — |
| ROCE | 6.2% | 21.1% | 1.3% | 6.0% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹121 Cr | ₹85 Cr | ₹36 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -78.2% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹11 Cr | ₹51 Cr | -₹1 Cr | -₹22 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
| ABB INDIA LIMITED | 92.6x | 19.1% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.