The 60-second version of Hanman Fit Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | — | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | — |
| EBITDA | ₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | +72.6% |
| EBITDA Margin | — | -233.3% | -968.2% | 43.1% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | -₹0 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -₹1 Cr | -₹0 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹-0.14 | ₹0.63 | ₹-0.78 | — | — |
| ROE | -7.9% | 26.7% | -49.1% | -6.7% | — |
| ROCE | -5.1% | -9.8% | -49.1% | -6.7% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | — | — | — |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹0 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.