The 60-second version of Hemo Organic Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹2 Cr | ₹1 Cr | +478.4% |
| EBITDA | -₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | — |
| EBITDA Margin | -1137.5% | -1169.6% | -1.8% | -53.6% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | -₹0 Cr | -₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | -₹1 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹-0.16 | ₹-0.76 | ₹0.47 | ₹-2.24 | — |
| ROCE | — | -28.4% | 1.9% | -17.3% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹0 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹3 Cr | +327.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹0 Cr | -₹1 Cr | -₹0 Cr | -₹1 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
| ABB INDIA LIMITED | 92.6x | 19.1% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 5 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.