The 60-second version of H.G. Infra Engineering Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹4,466 Cr | ₹5,125 Cr | ₹4,801 Cr | ₹4,943 Cr | +3.4% |
| EBITDA | ₹881 Cr | ₹1,073 Cr | ₹1,050 Cr | ₹1,008 Cr | +4.6% |
| EBITDA Margin | 19.7% | 20.9% | 21.9% | 20.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹493 Cr | ₹539 Cr | ₹505 Cr | ₹330 Cr | -12.5% |
| EPS | ₹75.68 | ₹82.64 | ₹77.56 | ₹50.69 | -12.5% |
| ROE | 25.7% | 21.9% | 17.1% | 10.1% | — |
| ROCE | 22.6% | 25.0% | 14.4% | 13.6% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹1,910 Cr | ₹1,513 Cr | ₹4,170 Cr | ₹5,029 Cr | +38.1% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹478 Cr | -₹544 Cr | -₹2,438 Cr | -₹704 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| ADANI PORT & SEZ LTD | 29.9x | 14.1% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.