The 60-second version of Himatsingka Seide Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹2,468 Cr | ₹2,577 Cr | ₹2,554 Cr | ₹2,337 Cr | -1.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹286 Cr | ₹601 Cr | ₹528 Cr | ₹512 Cr | +21.4% |
| EBITDA Margin | 11.6% | 23.3% | 20.7% | 21.9% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | -₹64 Cr | ₹113 Cr | ₹76 Cr | ₹62 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹-6.51 | ₹11.03 | ₹6.92 | ₹4.93 | — |
| ROE | -4.4% | 7.2% | 3.7% | 2.9% | — |
| ROCE | 3.5% | 11.6% | 8.0% | 9.6% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹2,806 Cr | ₹2,898 Cr | ₹2,567 Cr | ₹2,636 Cr | -2.1% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹344 Cr | ₹274 Cr | ₹212 Cr | ₹177 Cr | -19.9% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.