The 60-second version of Indo Farm Equipment Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹370 Cr | ₹375 Cr | ₹387 Cr | ₹439 Cr | +5.9% |
| EBITDA | ₹58 Cr | ₹62 Cr | ₹60 Cr | ₹66 Cr | +4.5% |
| EBITDA Margin | 15.6% | 16.5% | 15.4% | 15.0% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹15 Cr | ₹15 Cr | ₹24 Cr | ₹25 Cr | +17.1% |
| EPS | ₹3.2 | ₹3.21 | ₹5.7 | ₹5.14 | +17.1% |
| ROE | 5.3% | 4.9% | 4.4% | 4.4% | — |
| ROCE | 11.8% | 12.3% | 8.0% | 8.2% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹281 Cr | ₹272 Cr | ₹173 Cr | ₹150 Cr | -18.9% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹21 Cr | ₹31 Cr | ₹26 Cr | ₹0 Cr | -80.7% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD | 17.8x | 19.7% |
| ASHOK LEYLAND LTD | 25.2x | 24.4% |
| TATA MOTORS LIMITED | 37.1x | 32.8% |
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.