The 60-second version of Innovision Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹256 Cr | ₹510 Cr | ₹893 Cr | ₹981 Cr | +56.6% |
| EBITDA | ₹16 Cr | ₹18 Cr | ₹52 Cr | ₹61 Cr | +57.4% |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.1% | 3.6% | 5.8% | 6.2% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹9 Cr | ₹10 Cr | ₹29 Cr | ₹37 Cr | +60.8% |
| EPS | ₹3.73 | ₹4.36 | ₹12.38 | — | — |
| ROE | 22.1% | 19.8% | 35.8% | 12.6% | — |
| ROCE | 27.4% | 25.0% | 53.1% | 19.5% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹34 Cr | ₹49 Cr | ₹79 Cr | ₹125 Cr | +53.8% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹2 Cr | -₹0 Cr | -₹22 Cr | -₹31 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
| ABB INDIA LIMITED | 92.6x | 19.1% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.