The 60-second version of Jindal Poly Films Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly improving on the years of data available.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹4,633 Cr | ₹3,822 Cr | ₹5,238 Cr | ₹2,790 Cr | -15.6% |
| EBITDA | ₹551 Cr | ₹182 Cr | ₹447 Cr | ₹108 Cr | -41.8% |
| EBITDA Margin | 11.9% | 4.8% | 8.5% | 3.9% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹319 Cr | ₹71 Cr | ₹110 Cr | -₹1,060 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹72.85 | ₹16.33 | ₹25.08 | ₹-242.11 | — |
| ROE | 7.6% | 1.8% | 2.7% | -34.7% | — |
| ROCE | 6.4% | 2.8% | 3.3% | -18.2% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹4,085 Cr | ₹4,468 Cr | ₹4,420 Cr | ₹4,004 Cr | -0.7% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹1,260 Cr | -₹65 Cr | -₹103 Cr | -₹427 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 4 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.