The 60-second version of K.M. Sugar Mills Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹567 Cr | ₹657 Cr | ₹656 Cr | ₹658 Cr | +5.1% |
| EBITDA | ₹57 Cr | ₹77 Cr | ₹92 Cr | ₹99 Cr | +20.0% |
| EBITDA Margin | 10.1% | 11.7% | 13.9% | 15.0% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹23 Cr | ₹28 Cr | ₹36 Cr | ₹53 Cr | +32.0% |
| EPS | ₹2.52 | ₹3.05 | ₹3.86 | ₹5.81 | +32.1% |
| ROE | 8.4% | 9.3% | 10.5% | 13.6% | — |
| ROCE | 13.1% | 15.9% | 17.9% | 20.4% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹268 Cr | ₹291 Cr | ₹282 Cr | ₹250 Cr | -2.3% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹3 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹16 Cr | ₹37 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. | 42.5x | 21.5% |
| ITC LTD | 16.6x | 27.4% |
| NESTLE INDIA LIMITED | 59.8x | 79.9% |
| BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD | 44.1x | 51.0% |
A good business currently available at an undemanding price — the combination this framework exists to look for. The work left is qualitative: whether the advantage the numbers imply is one you can identify and expect to last. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.