The 60-second version of KNR Constructions Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹3,778 Cr | ₹4,429 Cr | ₹3,216 Cr | ₹2,062 Cr | -18.3% |
| EBITDA | ₹940 Cr | ₹1,192 Cr | ₹1,913 Cr | ₹777 Cr | -6.1% |
| EBITDA Margin | 24.9% | 26.9% | 59.5% | 37.7% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹458 Cr | ₹777 Cr | ₹1,002 Cr | ₹437 Cr | -1.5% |
| EPS | ₹16.29 | ₹27.64 | ₹35.62 | ₹15.54 | -1.6% |
| ROE | 16.5% | 21.9% | 22.1% | 8.8% | — |
| ROCE | 25.2% | 22.3% | 23.0% | 10.0% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹652 Cr | ₹1,262 Cr | ₹1,849 Cr | ₹2,444 Cr | +55.3% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹1,040 Cr | -₹380 Cr | -₹595 Cr | -₹163 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| ADANI PORT & SEZ LTD | 29.9x | 14.1% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.