The 60-second version of K.P. Energy Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹438 Cr | ₹473 Cr | ₹939 Cr | ₹1,497 Cr | +50.7% |
| EBITDA | ₹72 Cr | ₹89 Cr | ₹177 Cr | ₹321 Cr | +64.6% |
| EBITDA Margin | 16.4% | 18.7% | 18.8% | 21.5% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹44 Cr | ₹58 Cr | ₹115 Cr | ₹181 Cr | +60.5% |
| EPS | ₹6.58 | ₹8.73 | ₹17.22 | ₹26.86 | +59.8% |
| ROE | 34.2% | 31.4% | 36.8% | 34.7% | — |
| ROCE | 32.4% | 28.5% | 28.3% | 32.5% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹80 Cr | ₹179 Cr | ₹367 Cr | ₹482 Cr | +81.9% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹23 Cr | -₹5 Cr | -₹96 Cr | -₹95 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| ADANI PORT & SEZ LTD | 29.9x | 14.1% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
A good business currently available at an undemanding price — the combination this framework exists to look for. The work left is qualitative: whether the advantage the numbers imply is one you can identify and expect to last. 5 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.