The 60-second version of Krowniq Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹446 Cr | ₹395 Cr | ₹292 Cr | ₹389 Cr | -4.5% |
| EBITDA | ₹29 Cr | ₹12 Cr | ₹10 Cr | ₹13 Cr | -23.7% |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.6% | 3.0% | 3.4% | 3.3% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹16 Cr | ₹4 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹6 Cr | -25.6% |
| EPS | ₹8.12 | ₹2 | ₹1.35 | ₹3.34 | -25.6% |
| ROE | 57.0% | 12.3% | 7.7% | 15.9% | — |
| ROCE | 79.2% | 28.8% | 21.2% | 26.8% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹144 Cr | ₹89 Cr | ₹43 Cr | ₹107 Cr | -9.5% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹24 Cr | ₹65 Cr | ₹57 Cr | -₹32 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. | 42.5x | 21.5% |
| DABUR INDIA LTD | 34.7x | 17.2% |
| ITC LTD | 16.6x | 27.4% |
| BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD | 44.1x | 51.0% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.