The 60-second version of Madras Fertilizers Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹308 Cr | ₹244 Cr | ₹383 Cr | ₹390 Cr | +8.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹335 Cr | ₹144 Cr | ₹179 Cr | ₹183 Cr | -18.3% |
| EBITDA Margin | 109.0% | 59.0% | 46.7% | 46.9% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹185 Cr | ₹6 Cr | ₹64 Cr | ₹80 Cr | -24.3% |
| EPS | ₹11.5 | ₹0.35 | ₹3.99 | ₹4.99 | -24.3% |
| ROCE | — | — | 160.3% | 67.8% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹1,494 Cr | ₹1,583 Cr | ₹664 Cr | ₹634 Cr | -24.8% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹677 Cr | ₹143 Cr | ₹101 Cr | -₹26 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | 19.8x | 10.8% |
| JSW STEEL LIMITED | 12.0x | 24.7% |
| ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED | 37.6x | 11.1% |
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.