The 60-second version of M M Rubber Company Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
No clear supporting case emerges from the available numbers.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹41 Cr | ₹42 Cr | ₹41 Cr | ₹40 Cr | -1.1% |
| EBITDA | ₹4 Cr | ₹0 Cr | -₹2 Cr | ₹0 Cr | -63.5% |
| EBITDA Margin | 10.1% | 0.2% | -4.2% | 0.5% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹3 Cr | -₹2 Cr | -₹4 Cr | -₹1 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹4.11 | ₹-2.65 | ₹-5.91 | ₹-2.58 | — |
| ROE | 13.1% | -9.2% | -25.9% | -9.5% | — |
| ROCE | 15.0% | -3.2% | -14.4% | -4.4% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹3 Cr | ₹7 Cr | ₹11 Cr | ₹10 Cr | +59.9% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹1 Cr | -₹4 Cr | -₹3 Cr | ₹1 Cr | +16.1% |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| HAVELLS INDIA LIMITED | 43.5x | 17.1% |
| VOLTAS LTD | 75.8x | 7.0% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 4 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.