The 60-second version of MTAR Technologies Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹563 Cr | ₹573 Cr | ₹665 Cr | ₹865 Cr | +15.4% |
| EBITDA | ₹168 Cr | ₹112 Cr | ₹120 Cr | ₹189 Cr | +4.0% |
| EBITDA Margin | 29.8% | 19.6% | 18.0% | 21.8% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹103 Cr | ₹56 Cr | ₹53 Cr | ₹94 Cr | -3.1% |
| EPS | ₹33.62 | ₹18.24 | ₹17.19 | ₹30.57 | -3.1% |
| ROE | 16.7% | 8.3% | 7.3% | 11.4% | — |
| ROCE | 21.0% | 11.5% | 10.6% | 14.8% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹143 Cr | ₹191 Cr | ₹177 Cr | ₹377 Cr | +38.0% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹101 Cr | -₹37 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹63 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
| ABB INDIA LIMITED | 92.6x | 19.1% |
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| HAVELLS INDIA LIMITED | 43.5x | 17.1% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.