The 60-second version of NCC Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹15,390 Cr | ₹20,704 Cr | ₹21,999 Cr | ₹20,767 Cr | +10.5% |
| EBITDA | ₹1,397 Cr | ₹1,697 Cr | ₹1,812 Cr | ₹1,742 Cr | +7.6% |
| EBITDA Margin | 9.1% | 8.2% | 8.2% | 8.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹609 Cr | ₹711 Cr | ₹820 Cr | ₹675 Cr | +3.5% |
| EPS | ₹9.77 | ₹11.32 | ₹13.06 | ₹10.76 | +3.3% |
| ROE | 9.9% | 10.7% | 11.2% | 8.6% | — |
| ROCE | 18.4% | 20.7% | 20.6% | 15.3% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹974 Cr | ₹980 Cr | ₹1,594 Cr | ₹3,407 Cr | +51.8% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹753 Cr | ₹1,074 Cr | ₹422 Cr | -₹1,414 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| ADANI PORT & SEZ LTD | 29.9x | 14.1% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.