The 60-second version of National Fertilizers Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹7,117 Cr | ₹7,548 Cr | ₹5,896 Cr | ₹6,233 Cr | -4.3% |
| EBITDA | ₹1,457 Cr | ₹706 Cr | ₹778 Cr | ₹906 Cr | -14.6% |
| EBITDA Margin | 20.5% | 9.4% | 13.2% | 14.5% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹458 Cr | ₹150 Cr | ₹184 Cr | ₹211 Cr | -22.7% |
| EPS | ₹9.34 | ₹3.06 | ₹3.75 | ₹4.31 | -22.7% |
| ROE | 18.1% | 5.9% | 6.8% | 7.4% | — |
| ROCE | 17.9% | 10.0% | 9.9% | 12.0% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹3,993 Cr | ₹4,091 Cr | ₹2,001 Cr | ₹3,964 Cr | -0.2% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹541 Cr | ₹376 Cr | ₹2,389 Cr | -₹1,570 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | 19.8x | 10.8% |
| JSW STEEL LIMITED | 12.0x | 24.7% |
| ULTRATECH CEMENT LIMITED | 37.6x | 11.1% |
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.