The 60-second version of NMS Global Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹7 Cr | ₹25 Cr | ₹14 Cr | ₹43 Cr | +86.8% |
| EBITDA | ₹0 Cr | ₹2 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹2 Cr | +72.8% |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.9% | 6.9% | 8.6% | 5.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹1 Cr | +37.3% |
| EPS | ₹0.53 | ₹1.11 | ₹1.36 | ₹2.39 | +65.2% |
| ROE | 22.5% | 24.3% | 26.6% | 26.9% | — |
| ROCE | 3.7% | 6.7% | 4.7% | 4.6% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹8 Cr | ₹9 Cr | ₹6 Cr | ₹6 Cr | -9.6% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹4 Cr | ₹4 Cr | -₹13 Cr | ₹27 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. | 30.1x | 15.2% |
| ADANI PORT & SEZ LTD | 29.9x | 14.1% |
| SIEMENS LTD | 88.8x | 10.5% |
A reasonable business at a reasonable price. Nothing here is alarming and nothing is compelling, which usually means the decision rests on things this data cannot see — the industry's direction, management's intent, and what else is available to you. 3 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.