The 60-second version of Octavius Plantations Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹22 Cr | ₹24 Cr | ₹28 Cr | ₹64 Cr | +43.2% |
| EBITDA | ₹3 Cr | ₹2 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹3 Cr | -2.7% |
| EBITDA Margin | 12.9% | 8.8% | 4.3% | 4.1% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹2 Cr | ₹2 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | -24.2% |
| EPS | ₹6.31 | ₹5.94 | ₹2.9 | ₹2.75 | -24.2% |
| ROE | 11.6% | 9.8% | 4.6% | 4.2% | — |
| ROCE | 15.4% | 11.5% | 5.9% | 11.0% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹2 Cr | ₹2 Cr | ₹8 Cr | ₹20 Cr | +136.9% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹2 Cr | -₹2 Cr | -₹6 Cr | -₹11 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. | 42.5x | 21.5% |
| ITC LTD | 16.6x | 27.4% |
| NESTLE INDIA LIMITED | 59.8x | 79.9% |
| BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD | 44.1x | 51.0% |
The low price is the whole case here, and the business underneath scores poorly. Cheap-and-weak is what a value trap looks like from the outside — it needs a specific reason the numbers are about to improve, not just the observation that they are low. 5 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.