The 60-second version of Panchmahal Steel Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹487 Cr | ₹427 Cr | ₹382 Cr | ₹383 Cr | -7.7% |
| EBITDA | ₹16 Cr | ₹19 Cr | ₹17 Cr | ₹13 Cr | -5.4% |
| EBITDA Margin | 3.2% | 4.4% | 4.5% | 3.5% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹1 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹3 Cr | -₹2 Cr | — |
| EPS | ₹0.72 | ₹1.56 | ₹1.74 | ₹-1.19 | — |
| ROE | 0.9% | 1.9% | 2.1% | -1.5% | — |
| ROCE | 4.7% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 3.3% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹76 Cr | ₹40 Cr | ₹50 Cr | ₹35 Cr | -22.8% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹37 Cr | ₹38 Cr | -₹5 Cr | ₹25 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| TATA STEEL LIMITED | 19.8x | 10.8% |
| JSW STEEL LIMITED | 12.0x | 24.7% |
| JINDAL STEEL LIMITED | 39.1x | 5.3% |
| STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA | 16.5x | 7.1% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.