The 60-second version of Perfectpac Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹94 Cr | ₹101 Cr | ₹108 Cr | ₹108 Cr | +4.7% |
| EBITDA | ₹6 Cr | ₹8 Cr | ₹7 Cr | ₹7 Cr | +4.3% |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.5% | 7.4% | 6.1% | 6.4% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹3 Cr | ₹4 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹3 Cr | +3.6% |
| EPS | ₹4.25 | ₹5.98 | ₹4.73 | ₹4.73 | +3.6% |
| ROE | 8.9% | 11.4% | 8.4% | 7.9% | — |
| ROCE | 12.0% | 15.0% | 11.2% | 10.2% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹3 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹1 Cr | ₹3 Cr | +2.7% |
| Free Cash Flow | ₹4 Cr | ₹4 Cr | ₹0 Cr | -₹1 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. | 25.2x | 13.4% |
| TITAN COMPANY LIMITED | 68.5x | 36.7% |
| TRENT LTD | 87.2x | 25.9% |
| AVENUE SUPERMARTS LIMITED | 69.9x | 12.7% |
Poor scores on business quality without a price low enough to compensate. There is no obvious argument for owning this over a stronger company at a similar valuation. 1 high-severity red flag sits above this conclusion and should be read first.