The 60-second version of Phychem Technologies Limited — what it does, how it earns, and who it competes with, before any of the numbers below.
Nothing stands out as clearly deteriorating on the years of data available.
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | 3Y CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹42 Cr | ₹47 Cr | ₹50 Cr | ₹56 Cr | +10.1% |
| EBITDA | ₹3 Cr | ₹4 Cr | ₹5 Cr | ₹7 Cr | +36.9% |
| EBITDA Margin | 6.5% | 7.6% | 10.2% | 12.5% | — |
| PAT (Net Profit) | ₹1 Cr | ₹2 Cr | ₹3 Cr | ₹4 Cr | +45.9% |
| EPS | ₹1.28 | ₹1.65 | ₹2.78 | — | — |
| ROE | 25.5% | 24.7% | 29.3% | 29.7% | — |
| ROCE | 38.5% | 32.9% | 40.2% | 43.8% | — |
| Total Debt | ₹5 Cr | ₹6 Cr | ₹5 Cr | ₹6 Cr | +6.4% |
| Free Cash Flow | -₹0 Cr | ₹0 Cr | ₹2 Cr | ₹1 Cr | — |
| Company | P/E | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED | 46.9x | 22.3% |
| PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LTD | 57.8x | 24.4% |
| SRF LTD | 33.8x | 15.4% |
| UPL LIMITED | 21.5x | 6.1% |
A good business currently available at an undemanding price — the combination this framework exists to look for. The work left is qualitative: whether the advantage the numbers imply is one you can identify and expect to last. 2 high-severity red flags sit above this conclusion and should be read first.